Texas Supreme Court Slows Abbott’s Push to Remove Democratic Lawmakers

The Texas Supreme Court has rejected Governor Greg Abbott’s request for an immediate ruling on whether Democratic lawmakers who fled the state can be removed from office, opting instead for a longer review process.

Abbott had urged the court to act within 48 hours after House Democrats left Texas in early August to prevent a quorum and stall a vote on new congressional maps. But instead of a fast-track decision, justices gave both sides three weeks to file briefs, with responses due by September 4 — well after the current special session is expected to end, according to the Texas Tribune.

Abbott and Paxton Align on Lawsuit

Despite the delay, Abbott framed the move as progress, saying the briefing schedule moves Democratic leaders “closer to consequences.” His lawsuit targets Rep. Gene Wu of Houston, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, while a separate suit from Attorney General Ken Paxton seeks to remove Wu and 12 additional Democrats.

Though Abbott and Paxton initially clashed over who had the authority to pursue the case, Paxton has since said he looks forward to working alongside the governor to “hold these lawmakers accountable.”

Democrats’ Quorum-Busting Tactic

On August 3, dozens of Democratic members left the state, denying the House enough members to conduct business. The walkout was intended to block passage of the GOP’s proposed redistricting plan, which was introduced after pressure from former President Donald Trump. Trump has called for maps that would give Republicans up to five additional seats in Congress, bolstering the party’s narrow majority ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Democrats argue the redistricting push is a partisan attempt to cement Republican control, while critics note that Democratic-led states have employed similar gerrymandering strategies in the past.

Historic Move on the Line

No Texas legislator has ever been forcibly removed from office for breaking quorum. The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling could set a precedent with major implications for both parties — particularly as redistricting battles intensify nationwide.

Related Posts

Donald Trump Jr. Pays Heartfelt Tribute to Mother Ivana on Their Anniversary

Three years after losing his mother, Ivana Trump, Donald Trump Jr. turned to Instagram to share a message straight from the heart. Posted on July 14, 2025,…

Trump Slams Bruce Springsteen as a ‘Dried-Up Prune’ During Fiery Speech

One thing that we have seen from Donald Trump on a frequent basis over the course of his presidency is bickering. It seems as if he isn’t…

Right-wing influencer responds following dispute over Charlie Kirk tribute shirt

A conservative influencer says she’s refusing to back down after being publicly berated for wearing a Charlie Kirk tribute shirt, turning what started as a casual outing…

New York’s mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani drops 4 fiery words for Trump

In a historic landslide, New Yorkers have chosen 34-year-old Zohran Mamdani as the city’s next mayor, decisively defeating former governor Andrew Cuomo and Republican Curtis Sliwa. With…

Chicago Police Ordered to Stand Down as Border Patrol Agents Surrounded by Violent Mob

lA tense standoff erupted on Chicago’s South Side over the weekend after federal border enforcement agents were surrounded by a hostile crowd during a patrol operation —…

What’s the reason Aldi charges for shopping carts?

Why Aldi Charges for Shopping Carts Aldi, the popular discount grocery chain, has a policy that surprises some shoppers: customers must pay a small fee to use…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *