Texas Supreme Court Slows Abbott’s Push to Remove Democratic Lawmakers

The Texas Supreme Court has rejected Governor Greg Abbott’s request for an immediate ruling on whether Democratic lawmakers who fled the state can be removed from office, opting instead for a longer review process.

Abbott had urged the court to act within 48 hours after House Democrats left Texas in early August to prevent a quorum and stall a vote on new congressional maps. But instead of a fast-track decision, justices gave both sides three weeks to file briefs, with responses due by September 4 — well after the current special session is expected to end, according to the Texas Tribune.

Abbott and Paxton Align on Lawsuit

Despite the delay, Abbott framed the move as progress, saying the briefing schedule moves Democratic leaders “closer to consequences.” His lawsuit targets Rep. Gene Wu of Houston, chair of the House Democratic Caucus, while a separate suit from Attorney General Ken Paxton seeks to remove Wu and 12 additional Democrats.

Though Abbott and Paxton initially clashed over who had the authority to pursue the case, Paxton has since said he looks forward to working alongside the governor to “hold these lawmakers accountable.”

Democrats’ Quorum-Busting Tactic

On August 3, dozens of Democratic members left the state, denying the House enough members to conduct business. The walkout was intended to block passage of the GOP’s proposed redistricting plan, which was introduced after pressure from former President Donald Trump. Trump has called for maps that would give Republicans up to five additional seats in Congress, bolstering the party’s narrow majority ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.

Democrats argue the redistricting push is a partisan attempt to cement Republican control, while critics note that Democratic-led states have employed similar gerrymandering strategies in the past.

Historic Move on the Line

No Texas legislator has ever been forcibly removed from office for breaking quorum. The Supreme Court’s eventual ruling could set a precedent with major implications for both parties — particularly as redistricting battles intensify nationwide.

Related Posts

Donald Trump faces allegations of violating royal protocol with a ‘disgraceful’ gesture

Trump Sparks Outrage in Windsor Donald Trump ignited controversy just hours into his UK state visit after breaking a key royal protocol. The U.S. president and First…

TikTok Influencer with Progressive Views Faces Defeat in Election Bid

In Arizona’s 7th Congressional District, progressive influencer Deja Foxx suffered a heavy defeat, losing by more than 40 points to Adelita Grijalva, a well-known local politician. Grijalva,…

BREAKING: JIMMY KIMMEL DROPPED FROM 32 ABC STATIONS

🚨 BREAKING NEWS: Jimmy Kimmel, one of America’s most well-known late-night hosts, has been hit with a triple wave of backlash — a federal investigation, removal from…

Former schoolmate alleges Kirk endured severe bullying that nearly drove him to take his own life

Charlie Kirk’s Legacy and a High School Allegation Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, was tragically assassinated this month. His death left a divided following and…

Hallmark Star Passed Away At Age 84

Paula Shaw, the actress known for her work in Freddy vs. Jason and a number of Hallmark Channel movies, has died at the age of 84. Her…

Backlash Hits AOC Over Disclosure of Her Childhood Name and Where She Was Raised

AOC Faces Renewed Criticism Over Her Bronx Identity Suburban Roots Resurface Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez is under fire again for calling herself a proud “Bronx girl.” Critics point…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *